MAIN sues FCC over open Internet rules

The Mountain Area Informational Network (MAIN) has filed a lawsuit against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to overturn open Internet rules the agency approved in December, 2010.

MAIN, a non-profit Internet service provider based in Asheville, N.C., filed a petition for review on Sept. 26 with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Richmond, Va.

The rules stem from an FCC order entitled “Preserving the Open Internet” and took effect Sept. 23 upon publication in the Federal Register. The rules aim to preserve the Internet as an open platform for innovation, investment, job creation, economic growth, competition and free expression. Affected parties have 10 days after the rules’ publication to seek a court review.

MAIN contends that the rules are flawed, unenforceable, and fail to achieve the goals of preserving Internet freedoms, said Wally Bowen, MAIN’s founder and executive director.

MAIN’s petition asks the federal court to overturn the FCC order and to direct the agency to revisit its rulemaking. “Our goal is to have the FCC strengthen these open Internet rules to make them meaningful and enforceable in order to preserve the Internet as an open platform for grassroots innovation,” said Bowen.

“The original genius of the Internet is that control resided with end-users, but deregulation eight years ago shifted control to network owners. These rules attempt to mitigate this power-shift, but they are flawed,” Bowen said.

In its petition, MAIN argues that the FCC’s rules treat wireless and landline networks differently, giving wireless network-owners more power to dictate what users can do on the Internet.

“Granting more power to wireless network-owners reduces mobile access to a second-class service, discriminates against low-income users who rely on mobile devices, and disadvantages rural areas where wireless is often the only broadband access available,” said Bowen.

He said the lawsuit could help raise public awareness of the need for enforceable rules-of-the-road to preserve the freedoms of grassroots innovation and expression that have made the Internet a revolutionary technology.

Founded in 1995, MAIN is one of the nation’s oldest nonprofit Internet service providers. In its lawsuit, MAIN is represented by the Media Access Project, a public interest law firm based in Washington D.C. END

Be Sociable, Share!

4 Responses to “MAIN sues FCC over open Internet rules”

  1. Way to go, Wally. We’re with you all the way.

  2. Carolyn Riley says:

    Way to go…it’s why I keep you as my internet provider!

  3. mac tidwell says:

    Thank you Mr.Bowen, for working to keep the internet open to all groups. We certainly don’t need to give more power to the wireless network-owners. Corporations are running the country in almost every area already, we don’t need to enable more of them to do it.

  4. Member says:

    Help could come in the form a new addition to government. The system doesn’t serve your interest because it is too busy serving special interest. Do you care? Wake up to these facts and realize that you must act if you want to go beyond the status quo. There are those that are still asleep and convinced in their beliefs that modern times don’t require a more reasonable and fitting form of control over government. They believe that the system for what may have worked for the government over a hundred years ago can’t be improved upon. They are wrong! It is inherently systemic in the process for government to be easily, continually and totally gamed by special interest. Yet, this can be changed and improved but it must be done systematically if the improvements are to last and not be subverted again and again by special interest! Actions speak louder than words. It is now time for action! If you are willing to take action read on?

    Presently, elected officials votes reflect at least one of three possibilities: their interest, some other (special) interest or the interest of their constituents. The problem comes when elected officials don’t reflect the interest of the majority of their constituents with their votes. Yet, most elected officials are just smart enough to get elected while saying they will vote for their constituents interest. Well, most people no longer trust their words on this.

    Isn’t it time that you participate directly in government concerning your own interest. No, not as a politician, but as a constituent of your elected officials. If you were to participate directly in government in this capacity you might find that yours and most other people’s interest are the same most of the time. Together, in this capacity you might find that great positive changes can be accomplished.

    There is a modern-day equivalent of the movement that added the Bill of Rights to the Constitution. It is a political movement that will make local, state and national government, more transparent, less corrupt, more accountable, less wasteful, more fair and just. That political movement is “The People’s Branch” at ThePeoplesBranch(dot)org. The People’s Branch is a realistic, reasonable and non-violent, way for the people to regain control of government from special interest.

    The People’s Branch is working to create an additional check and balance upon each elected official by giving their constituents the power to directly participate in the governing process alongside their elected officials. It works like this. Presently, elected officials exercise their vote regardless of their constituent’s interests. However, with The People’s Branch, the change comes when legislation is finished and the elected officials have voted. i.e. The job to implement and start legislation remains with elected officials. Presently, elected officials see the need for or are persuaded (by their constituents or some other (special) interest) to create legislation regarding some matter. Then the other elected officials either see the need or are persuaded (by their constituents or some other (special) interest) to vote one way or another on that legislation. Whither or not any particular legislation serves some constituents interest or some other (special) interest is always debatable.

    More to the point, with The People’s Branch each elected official’s vote concerning a legislative matter may remain the same or be changed by a majority vote by their constituents. Constituent voting is voluntary and may be exercised by electronic means from home or office. Constituents only vote on their own elected official’s vote. Constituents may only vote to approve or disapprove said officials vote. Only when the majority vote of the constituents approve their elected official’s vote does that elected official’s vote remain unchanged. Otherwise, if the majority vote of said constituents disapprove the elected official’s vote then said official’s vote is altered to reflect the position of the majority of the constituents. In this way, the constituents are the ultimate check and balance for their own elected officials.

    The technology now exists that can implement this process. Implementing a “People’s Branch” at each level of government, local, state and national, will virtually guarantee a government that is more transparent, less corrupt, more accountable, less wasteful, more fair and equitable. Politicians fear this political movement because they know that if it succeeds then their power and control will come to an end and the people’s influence upon government will truly begin.

    There has never been a greater need for the political solution(s) provided by The People’s Branch. But no one is saying it is going to be easy. Yet, neither was the Civil Rights movement or the Women’s Suffrage movement, etc., etc. So, why is it that even though everyone is for better government, a political movement that would ultimately improve government at all levels by neutralizing special interest’s control is yet to be implemented? It hasn’t happened yet because you haven’t made it happen. When things get bad enough you may be willing to make it happen then. Why wait and go through that pain when the needed changes can be done now. Why not save yourself, your loved ones and a lot of other people a lot of pain and hardship?

    Remember even with The People’s Branch government still remains a republic. Officials are still elected by their constituents. Elected officials responsibilities remain essentially the same. Nothing is essential is taken away from government, but, something very important and greatly needed is added. The people themselves will become their greatest champions for keeping government honest and fair. The People’s Branch will ensure their elected officials actions are more as they should be.

    This political movement belongs to you and everyone that chooses to take up the cause. You are encouraged to take action and get involved. Help create the political solution that has the best chance to truly reform the evils of government in a sustainable way! You can help make this political movement a service to everyone. Go to the web site, learn the plan, spread the word, start a petition drive, get enough signed petitions from voters in your area and put this issue on the ballot. Then the people can pass it with their vote – town, city, municipality, county, locally, statewide and nationally. You, your family and future generations will be grateful for the positive changes.